Monday, December 31, 2012

Toward a New Year of Peace.

Let us all dedicate this New Year to love and peace.
Let us live our lives in this same love and peace,
both in our actions and in our words.
It is my hope that all humanity,
and you, friends,
Be blessed in this year of 2013.

David E.Gonzales

O Lord, draw near to the peoples
Who have known the sacred mysteries,
That throughout this year no dangers may afflict
Those who always trust in your protection.
Through Christ our Lord.1
Amen (so be it)

1 – Roman Missal

Monday, December 24, 2012

Love, Peace and Bliss


Artist unknown

I desire for all of you a most happy and blessed Christmas,
as we receive the greatest gift ever given,
the gift of perfect love.
And so I wish for you, regardless of your faith,
a life filled with Love, Peace and Bliss,
and to everyone whose path you should come across,
may you share with them these blessings of Love, Peace and Bliss.

David E.Gonzales

Monday, December 17, 2012

. . . turn and become like children. . .

The recent tragedy in Sandy’s Hook reminds us of our responsibility to protect children and the greatness of that obligation. Jesus uses children to help us understand that is not just a need for today but is in essence just one commitment of many to insure our place in heaven. It is necessary that children trust us “adults” to take care of them, to protect them, nurture them in the study of math, language, science and faith. As in the time of Jesus, children must have the guidance and protection of us in order for them to survive and thrive.
If all sins against humanity are sins against God, then sins against children are the greatest sins against God. What we saw at Sandy’s Hook was the complete absence of God in the heart of one man. While it will take a lifetime for those immediately involved in this tragic event to deal with their grief,
we can be assured that the circumstances of this day are now gone. The person responsible at Sandy’s Hook can hurt no one again, not ever.
It is now the time to begin the process of healing, for the families directly and indirectly effected, for law enforcement to review their procedures, for the schools to double check their priorities, and for the politicians to dig deep into their conscience’s. Moms and dads across the country will no doubt engage in conversations about the safety of their children. And we will all pray for peace on earth and good will toward all.

(Matt, 18; 3 – 5)
1Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me.
“: the child is held up as a model for the disciples not because of any supposed innocence of children but because of their complete dependence on, and trust in, their parents. So must the disciples be, in respect to God”. (CSB)

(Mark, 10; 14 – 16)
1When Jesus saw this he became indignant and said to them, "Let the children come to me; do not prevent them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. Amen, I say to you, whoever does not accept the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it." Then he embraced them and blessed them, placing his hands on them.
i.e. in total dependence upon and obedience to the gospel. . .” (CSB)

May the love and peace of God be with you in this time of great need.

1 = NABRE
CSB = Catholic Study Bible
by David E.Gonzales

Monday, December 10, 2012

Christmas, The Beginning of the End?

Did you know that in eschatology, by some, that the birth of Christ is considered the beginning of the “the last things”? This simply means that since the birth of Christ the Parousia, or the second coming of the Messiah, is at hand and the final judgment will end life as we currently know it. The word of God will come to its fulfillment and history will begin anew.
            It is true that Christmas signifies and celebrates the birth of God incarnate, that the Messiah has come and taught us the way to salvation. And it is right that we celebrate this day of mystery. It is right that we celebrate it by extending our love to each other beyond the everyday niceties we regularly practice.
But, at least for today, let us extend this thought a little further than we normally do. Let us imagine that we are indeed one day closer to the last things of Earth as we know it, and by that same end we are also one day closer to a new life that we can’t even imagine. This new life would be forever that of perfect love. This is our hope, not to be comfortable in this life of Earthly existence, but to be in heaven however you believe it to be, and to live with our God, Spirit, or Higher Power in the perfection of love.
            Consider this, after the ‘last things” the Holy Trinity may no longer be understood as it is today, perhaps it may not need to be understood at all. Perhaps there will no longer be a Father Son and Holy Spirit, but instead we will have a full knowledge of the one true God, as Christ “hands over the kingdom to his God and Father. . . so that God may be all in all”. (1 Cor. 15:24a, 28b)
            What if the end times are our individual lives? After all we live through many if not all the circumstances that are described in the Bible. What if the Parousia is a personal experience instead of a general or global experience that we all seem to expect? Could it be that during this time of life, we experience all that is imperfect, before we can reach perfection? “For behold, the kingdom of God is among you” (Luke 17; 21b), perhaps it is at the time of our physical death that we experience the Parousia, final judgment, and of course, Heaven or Hell. ? Do we not start dying at the moment of our birth?
Given the teaching of Christ “the last will be first” (Luke 13; 30-Mark 9; 35b-Matt 20; 26, 27) might this mean that those on skid-row are the first in heaven? And if so where does that leave the rest of us? Are you the “rich man” (Luke, 16; 19-31) or are you “the good Samaritan” (Luke, 10; 29-37) and how are you looked upon by your friends and neighbors?
            In the story of Sodom and Gomorrah God doesn’t smite the dwellers of these cities until the last “good” has left. Could this mean that the second coming of Christ will be when the last “good has already been taken from this Earth? This would leave only the wicked to experience what they have created.
            If heaven is being in the total presence of God, and God is love in its totality, then Hell would be the complete absence of God and the complete absence of love. In the world today we can see the absence of love at work. In the world today we can also see love at work. Perhaps this is a preview of what is meant by the terms, Heaven and Hell.
The Messiah has given us our place in heaven, but it is our responsibility to reserve that place in heaven by the way we live our lives. The best question I can think of is, are we living our lives in selfishness or charity? When you look in the mirror and ask this question, what do you see?
            I truly do not mean to be so glum before we celebrate this season that is normally light hearted, but this is where the Spirit has lead me. Christmas is a day of celebration; it is also a day to rededicate our lives in love.
May the love of Christ be with you and your loved ones throughout this season of beginnings.

Scripture is from the NABRE
by David E.Gonzales

Monday, November 26, 2012

Quick answers about Advent

Since Advent is just around the corner I thought that a little clarity on the just what Advent is, or what it is meant to be, would be nice way to start things off. This is a time of expectation for the birth of the Messiah, and a time of personal preparation for this event. This is also a time of self-exploration, a time to check our Spirituality and get back in touch with those things that should be most important in our lives.
            Below are answers to some of the most common questions regarding Advent.

Advent (Lat., adventus, “coming”),1
“This season of joyful expectation has a twofold character: it prepares for the commemoration of the Incarnation celebrated during the Christmas season, and it looks forward to Christ’s Second Coming at the end of time”.1) “The first two Sundays highlight Christ’s Second Coming; the last two, incarnational themes, with the forth Sunday adverting to Mary”.1) 
           
“The first candle on the Advent wreath has been called the Prophecy candle; the liturgical color for this Sunday is purple/violet.
The Second candle on the Advent wreath has been called the Bethlehem candle; the liturgical color for this Sunday is purple/violet.
The third candle on the Advent wreath has been called the Shepherd’s candle; the liturgical color for this Sunday is Rose, this Sunday is called Gaudete (Rejoice) Sunday
The forth candle on the Advent wreath has been called the Angel’s candle; the liturgical color for this Sunday is purple/violet.
The fifth Candle is in the middle of the Advent wreath is a large white candle; this candle is called the Christ Candle. The Christ candle is lit during the Vigil Mass or during the Nativity of the Lord”.3

Beginning the Church's liturgical year, Advent is the season leading up to the celebration of Christmas. The Advent season is a time of preparation that directs our hearts and minds to Christ’s second coming at the end of time and also to the anniversary of the Lord’s birth on Christmas. Advent devotions remind us of the meaning of the season. Special Advent devotions include the lighting of the Advent wreath; the Advent calendar which helps remind us of the season with daily thoughts and activities; Advent prayers that prepare us spiritually for the birth of Jesus Christ.-
Traditionally, Advent wreaths are constructed of a circle of evergreen branches into which four candles are inserted, representing the four weeks of Advent.  Ideally, three candles are purple and one is rose, but white candles can also be used. 
The purple candles in particular symbolize the prayer, penance, and preparatory sacrifices and goods works undertaken at this time. The rose candle is lit on the third Sunday, Gaudete Sunday, when the priest also wears rose vestments at Mass; Gaudete Sunday is the Sunday of rejoicing, because the faithful have arrived at the midpoint of Advent, when their preparation is now half over and they are close to Christmas.
The progressive lighting of the candles symbolizes the expectation and hope surrounding our Lord’s first coming into the world and the anticipation of his second coming to judge the living and the dead”.2

            Now is the time to ask yourself, what does Advent mean to me? Advent, like all the liturgical seasons, is what you make of it. Try and set aside a little additional time to read the daily scriptures. Do your best to relate these reading, stories, or teachings to your life.
           
May your Advent experience be rich with new life.
1.      The Encyclopedia of Catholicism, by Richard P. McBrien
3.      A Dictionary of Church Terms and Symbols, by Loice Gouker (out of print)
By David E.Gonzales

Monday, November 19, 2012

Porno, no, no.

             Porn, in print or film, is a stimulant and as any stimulant it can become a substance for addiction. In the case of child porn, which I consider the most grievous and disdainful act of sexual expression, the injury to children must not be tolerated to any extent. In the Bible Jesus states that, “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea”. (Mat, 18; 6) This teaching is as clear as it gets. To me, child porn is a clear example of distancing ourselves from our God, Spirit, or Higher Power. This is also a clear example of not living a spiritual life. This type of sexual behavior is not in the context of love that our God has taught us. This is not the love of charity, of taking care of one another; it is a destructive action, one taken out of the context of reality.
As does any stimulant, it excites the senses and makes us feel good. At least for a short time, that is as long as the drug or stimulant is in force for the mind and/or body react accordingly. One of the problems with these kinds of artificial stimulants is that they distort reality. It is this distortion of reality that can create a world that has been normalized to the abuser. The abuse becomes the standard by which they live their lives. Whether the addiction is drugs, alcohol, or sex, the addicted will be able to justify their actions based on the strength of their perceived need. In this case the addiction is sex, each person, men and women alike, will find a way to satisfy their particular exaggerated perception of their sexual desire.
            There is most notably the abuse to the unwilling participant in printed or video porn. The exploited children, women and men are the victims of abuse. By engaging in the porn industry, print, film, computer sites, or graphic-illustrations, you are contributing to the continue abuse of this group. No industry can exist without profitability, and right now the porn industry is as profitable as any that exists.
            If you are engaged in this type of visual or physical behavior, or know someone who is, please check out, http://saa-recovery.org

Scripture citing is from the NABRE
by David E.Gonzales

Monday, November 12, 2012

To be Apathetic…

It is said that the opposite of love is hate. I would disagree with this statement; the opposite of love is not hate, but is instead apathy. To simply not care about those who are in greater need than we are, must be the greatest of sins.
I believe that apathy is the greatest threat to humanity that exists today. For the more that the people are willing to accept or allow government agency’s to do the work of charity, or politicians to repress us in our speech, faith, or recreation, etc. the increasingly we will become a slave of our own making. We must be like children to enter the kingdom of God, (Mat. 18; 3) this does not mean to be innocent or immature, but instead to be totally dependent on others for their/our very survival. This means that we as adults are to be totally dependent on the God, Spirit, or the Higher Power of our faith. To extend this thought further, this would mean that it is the responsibility of the better off to make sure the poor are clothed and the hungry are fed. (Mat. 35-36a) Please note that I stated the “better off” and not the “rich”, for even the poor can, and do, help the poor. If the world becomes apathetic then the suffering of humanity will continue to grow. And I believe that this suffering will continue to grow to unprecedented levels.      
The call of all the major faiths is a call for intervention into the world of suffering. There is a time for prayer, meditation and contemplation, but when this has run its course then becomes a time for action. This is the time for a positive physical action to help those in need. Regardless if this occurs during the regular course of the day or in an emergency situation. Acts of charity are acts of love; however love without works of charity/love is but an empty thought. Without the action of charity, love has no meaning.
I can think of no greater disconnect from God, Spirit or Higher Power than to have no concern for the needy, the mourning, the outcasts of society, for those who have no one who cares for them, psychologically, physically, and/or emotionally. Yes, apathy is indeed the sin of sins, the quickest departure from our faith of God, Spirit, or Higher Power. Apathy may be the greatest gift that Lucifer, evil, has ever bestowed upon humanity throughout all of history.
May you be empowered to help, someone, somewhere, somehow.
           
Scripture is from the NABRE

by David E.Gonzales

Monday, November 5, 2012

No! God didn’t do it.

I know, I know. I too have heard the yelps of those who believe that this latest storm was delivered by God, Spirit, or Higher Power because of the sins committed by the people who live there; whether it’s gambling, prostitutions drug use etc. I know that these religious people take note of the story of Sodom and Gomorrah and point out that God smote them from the Earth because of their unrighteousness, their immorality. I find this thinking absolutely absurd.
            
          First, if you read the story carefully you will notice that Lot was willing to send out his daughters to satisfy the sexual desires of the crowd. I cannot see any moral difference between the crowds desires to rape and the father sending out his daughters to prostitute for peace. Furthermore, God made sure that not one righteous person was left in the city(s) when the time of destruction came to pass. God, Spirit or Higher Power does not allow the innocent to suffer for the ills of the guilty. I think that a good argument could be made that God does not directly punish the sinner here on Earth. While I do believe in a kind of karma, a "what goes around, comes around" or “you reap what you sow”, (Gal, 6; 7) philosophy; I believe that there is only one “judgment” and that will happen in the fullest of time.
            
          Sodom and Gomorrah is not a story of sexual misbehavior; it is a story of inhospitality. To not be hospitable in these early days of Judaism was one of their greatest sins. This is what Jesus was so upset about during his ministry, defiling the temple, not taking care of the orphans and widows, ignoring the poor; these are the sins that were being exposed in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah and by Jesus during his ministry.
          
          I do not believe in a God that is harmful to the good. So then why are there disasters all across our earth? Did not God create all things? Yes, God did create all things, but God does not make of himself the controller of all things. God does not micro manage! We have things of the world and things of the Spirit; God created the spirit but does not control how we, his children, interpret, accept or refuse that Spirit. God created the things of the world, but did build the world as we know it. God  The environment that we live in is just part of our lives. We accept moderate weather as fact, but for some reason we need to explain extreme weather as something divine. That something disastrous is created for our good, a lesson to be taught. This brings into question the subject of miracles; I am not going to address that subject here.
gave us the power of thought, the ability to use the things of the world, and the intelligence to create. God gave us nature, however God does not use nature as a weapon.
          
          I seems to me that this type of scripture interpretation comes from a fundamentalist’s point of view. Some of the problems with this type of thinking are that it brings about a boasting of self righteousness. This self righteousness may sound something like; “Oh! Look at me; I must be in Gods’ favor for no harm came to me”. Another problem is the thinking that God paints humanity with a broad brush. That somehow it’s ok to punish the good alongside sinner. God knows us each by name, and our judgment will come in the fullness of time. Until then it is up to each individual to live their lives, hopefully for the good of humanity.
          
          If this wasn't brought about by God then why is it here? It’s not in the storm where you find God, Spirit or Higher Power. No, you will find God before, during and after the storm, people helping people prepare or escape from the ravages to come. It’s during the storm when people rescue people or bring calm to shattered nerves, this is where you find God. It’s after the storm when people work side by side to repair their homes, businesses and the broken lives of family, friends and strangers alike, this is where you find God.
          
          God does not create disaster, God freely offers Grace, to all who are willing to accept it, to give us the wisdom and strength to continue moving onward in peace and love. No one was punished in this latest storm, but many are and will be rewarded by their actions of bravery and kindness.

May peace of mind, strength of Grace and the power of the Spirit be with you during these times of strife and always.

Scripture references are from the NABRE

by David E.Gonzales

Monday, October 29, 2012

The Religious, Right? or HONESTLY! part three.

In, The Religious, Left, I said that we either live our lives in the same way we understand our faith or we don’t. This holds true for those that are called the Religious Right.
            There is, however, a political left and a political right and the further either way we trend, the further away from our spiritual center we live our lives. It seems that the further to the right a group becomes the more fundamental is their scriptural interpretation. This fundamentalism has the same counter-productive action that a click in a school might have. It becomes selective, restricted, and intolerant of anyone who does not believe in and represent their way of faith. I also stated in part two that I felt the increasingly progressive we live our lives the more secular we become as a people. This secularism also has the inclination of breeding its unique brand of intolerance. This holds true to the Right, albeit diametrically opposed, as we begin to live our lives in the fundamentalists’ point of view. Instead of living our lives in the secular we begin to live our lives in the secluded. We begin to see ourselves as special. We see ourselves as on the right, as right, and therefore all must follow us or be damned. And this is just so wrong!
Why is this so wrong? It is wrong because it puts us in the position to judge. It is not in our power to judge others in the Spirit, period. This type of judging is not the same as a court of law would be, and should not be confused with or combined with legal judging.
If a woman has made the choice of abortion, it is her choice to make, it is not in our power to stand outside a business and verbally chastise anyone or physically abuse or force anyone to change because you disagree with her. Respectful protests that are displayed within the law are usually accepted by most in the community. Pray for her, her family, the father of the child, and of course the child. It is good to show empathy, sympathy, to mourn for the loss of life, but do not judge, and not to take into your hands the free will of another.
            It is not an act of faith when the Holy Book of another’s faith is defiled simply because we don’t agree with it. It is it not okay to judge the many in a faith because of the few that take a radical stance in regards to their faith. It is not an act of faith to defile the Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque or any Holy Building because you feel you’re better than they are. To think that one group has the entire answer to the question of salvation is simply narcissistic in nature.
            It is not spreading of the Gospel to protest outside a burial ground those who have giving their lives to protect their home land. To harm a family that is in mourning for their loved one is not following edicts of any God, Spirit or Higher Power. Free speech is both a wonderful right and incredible responsibility. Free speech should never be taken lightly, and should always be articulated with great care.
            In scripture, particularly in Luke, we read a series of Jesus’ teachings that tell of the dangers of these kinds of actions. Beginning at Luke 6; 27, and continuing through Luke 6; 45, the titles given to these teachings are “Love of Enemies”, “Judging Others”, and “A Tree Known by Its Fruit”. These teaching can be described as teachings of humility, charity, forgiveness and tolerance. These teachings begin with the individual, starting within, and flows outward to all whose paths we cross.
            A personal bugaboo of mine is that many on the so called right do their works in the name of God. They hold up their Holy Books in the name of the God of love, and then by their actions, they bring impiety to the forefront. No one has the right to dominate another person because they interpret scripture as right, duty or as a command from God. If your actions are not expressed in the love that is God, then how would you describe them?
Allow me at this juncture to follow-up on the point that I made in regards to peer pressure in part two. This point is that peer pressure is not to be dismissed as incidental. There is no doubt that peer pressure is a strong influence most especially with the younger generation as they are still developing their core beliefs.
            Everyday we come across forks in the road. And every day we must make choices as to which way we are going on our journey. I choose the “forks in the road” analogy because many forks are not two prong in design but instead are three pronged. The forks on the outer edges represent the two paths moving away from our respected faiths, away from our spirituality. Regardless if we choose the progressive or the conservative route, we are not following the edicts of our chosen faith. The center prong is the path to a higher conscience, a closer relationship with our God, Spirit, or Higher Power. This is the narrow path of love through charity, acceptance of the good in humanity, the humility of our place in the physical world and our spiritual existence with the life we live in everyday reality. If all sins against humanity are sins against God then we as a people faith cannot stray from the teachings of that faith, most especially when we are dealing with the imperfection that is humanity.
            Challenge, tomorrow when you get up from bed, look at yourself in the mirror, directly in the eyes, and ask yourself this. What kind of God, Spirit, Higher Power, do I believe in. Then ask; what kind of person am I? Answer honestly with no excuses! Is there a gap? Why?
Now for the hard part, WRITE – IT – DOWN!

May the Graces of God, Spirit, and Higher Power be with you to guide you through your journey.

Scripture reference is based on the NABRE version.

by D.E.Gonzales

Monday, October 22, 2012

Grief, what’s so good about it?

            Grief, I am willing to bet that this is not your first choice in reading. But grief is something that each person, without exception, has to deal with. And no, it isn’t always the loss of a loved one. Death of a child or a loved one, I would say, is the most intense grief experience that a person may go through. The loss of a loved one, husband, wife, child, close friend, these are some of the more recognizable ones, but no one has to die for you to experience grief. Empty nesters experience grief as do pet owners, especially those that may not have had children. Divorce causes grief as well, the loss of a love that was thought to last forever, now gone. Grief is an experience; it is also a process that everyone will have to deal with sooner or later. It is the experience of loss and the process of grief that follows, that hurts us, that breaks our hearts. Every one reacts to a loss through their individual perception. Some react through their religious traditions while others react through their secular culture.
            Much of how a person grieves may depend on an individual’s understanding of their faith. If you truly believe that that “He will wipe every tear from their eyes, and there shall be no more death or mourning, wailing or pain,” … (Rev. 21: 4a) If you believe that they are home, truly home, where the love they have now is more pure than anything we here on earth can ever experience. Than the grieving that these people endure, may very well be less than that of those who do not have this, or some similar understanding.
            Grieving has been described as a process. It helps to understand that there are steps or stages that a person must go through in order to ease the pain of grief. It also helps to understand that there is no “cure” for grief. I choose to use the term “phases” since not everyone will go through the same order of these steps or stages. There are different models on which grieving can be looked at. And I will list the one that I have found to be most helpful later. Being able to understand grieving will help many through the progression of grieving. This paper is meant to be an understanding of grief and as an encouragement for you to look deeper into this subject.
            Loss is that something or someone, that is no longer accessible to us in the physical sense. We may miss someone we love while they are on a trip, but we are pretty sure that they will return in good time. Now suddenly we may have to come to the acceptance that seeing them in good time means “when we meet again in heaven”. But even that does not help us in the here and now, their gone and I’m still here. I grieve because I can no longer have that which I have had for long. It is the familiar that we are missing.
            Our men and women in uniform also suffer from grief. Some of the grief they suffer is from the loss of their fellow soldiers; for others it may be a loss of innocence. A reality that only war or some kind of tragedy can bring about. They have lost something of themselves. They grieve for that loss, physical and/or emotional because they want it back, and it’s just not there anymore.
            We are all mortal. I know of no one that would dispute that fact. And yet it is more often than not that the talk of death is taboo. We do not prepare ourselves or our loved ones for death. We wish to not put together funeral arraignments for ourselves or even for our loved ones until after the death. We leave the chore to our children, friends or even our legal representatives. I am of the thought that the more open we are about death and dying, and what we believe about it, the less painful death will be. The more we understand death in the context of our faith the more we will be able to express ourselves with a positive sense of life after death. Both for those who have departed and for those of us that are here to bear the loss.
            Understanding how your faith views death, dying, and bereavement can help you along your journey through these most difficult times. This is true whether you are dealing with the death of loved one, friend or you are enduring the pain of rehabilitation, physical and/or emotional. By openly discussing this with someone knowledgeable in your faith, preferably someone who has been trained in chaplaincy, you can attain an additional approach of dealing with your particular concern.
            On the occasion I had patients tell me they were mad at God. They would say that they felt bad about these feelings, and they didn’t think it was right to have these feelings, since they believed that God is love. Yes, it is ok to be mad at God. Perhaps it would be better to say, mad with God. God has no desire to see us in pain. Be mad with God, express yourself verbally, let out the pain, and then let the wind take that pain away. Do not keep the pain inside, hidden. The longer you hide the pain the more the pain will fester into anger and anger into hate. And hate can only be self destructive.
            Yes, grief can be good, or more correctly stated, good for us. Going through the agony of grief can bring us to a degree of peace and understanding within us, as well as bringing us to a closer and improved understanding of our faith. Read, discuses, and pray for the understanding that God rejoices with us in our good times and most especially suffers with us in our greatest times of need.
May your times of need be softened by the Grace and love of God
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIVE STAGES OF GRIEF
The following can be found at; http://www.ekrfoundation.org / The Elisabeth Kubler-Ross Foundation
Also known as the ‘grief cycle’, it is important to bear in mind that Kübler-Ross did not intend this to be a rigid series of sequential or uniformly timed steps. It’s not a process as such, it’s a model or a framework. There is a subtle difference: a process implies something quite fixed and consistent; a model is less specific – more of a shape or guide. By way of example, people do not always experience all of the five ‘grief cycle’ stages. Some stages might be revisited. Some stages might not be experienced at all. Transition between stages can be more of an ebb and flow, rather than a progression. The five stages are not linear; neither are they equal in their experience. People’s grief, and other reactions to emotional trauma, are as individual as a fingerprint.
In this sense you might wonder what the purpose of the model is if it can vary so much from person to person. An answer is that the model acknowledges there to be an individual pattern of reactive emotional responses which people feel when coming to terms with death, bereavement, and great loss or trauma, etc. The model recognizes that people have to pass through their own individual journey of coming to terms with death and bereavement, etc., after which there is generally an acceptance of reality, which then enables the person to cope.
The model is perhaps a way of explaining how and why ‘time heals’, or how ‘life goes on’. And as with any aspect of our own or other people’s emotions, when we know more about what is happening, then dealing with it is usually made a little easier.
Again, while Kübler-Ross’ focus was on death and bereavement, the grief cycle model is a useful perspective for understanding our own and other people’s emotional reaction to personal trauma and change, irrespective of cause.
EKR stage
Interpretation
1 – Denial
Denial is a conscious or unconscious refusal to accept facts, information, reality, etc., relating to the situation concerned. It’s a defense mechanism and perfectly natural. Some people can become locked in this stage when dealing with a traumatic change that can be ignored. Death of course is not particularly easy to avoid or evade indefinitely.
2 – Anger
Anger can manifest in different ways. People dealing with emotional upset can be angry with themselves, and/or with others, especially those close to them. Knowing this helps keep detached and non-judgemental when experiencing the anger of someone who is very upset.
3 – Bargaining
Traditionally the bargaining stage for people facing death can involve attempting to bargain with whatever God the person believes in. People facing less serious trauma can bargain or seek to negotiate a compromise. For example “Can we still be friends?..” when facing a break-up. Bargaining rarely provides a sustainable solution, especially if it’s a matter of life or death.
4 – Depression
Also referred to as preparatory grieving. In a way it’s the dress rehearsal or the practice run for the ‘aftermath’ although this stage means different things depending on whom it involves. It’s a sort of acceptance with emotional attachment. It’s natural to feel sadness and regret, fear, uncertainty, etc. It shows that the person has at least begun to accept the reality.
5 – Acceptance
Again this stage definitely varies according to the person’s situation, although broadly it is an indication that there is some emotional detachment and objectivity. People dying can enter this stage a long time before the people they leave behind, who must necessarily pass through their own individual stages of dealing with the grief.

(Based on the Grief Cycle model first published in On Death & Dying, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, 1969. Interpretation by Alan Chapman 2006-2009..
            -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following has been copied from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: http://wikipeda.org
Kübler-Ross originally applied these stages to people suffering from terminal illness. She later expanded this theoretical model to apply to any form of catastrophic personal loss (job, income, freedom). Such losses may also include significant life events such as the death of a loved one, major rejection, end of a relationship or divorce, drug addition, incarceration, the onset of a disease or chronic illness, an infertility, diagnosis, as well many tragedies and disasters. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following prayer is from the Order of Christian Funerals: I found during my study and practice in the field of chaplaincy that this prayer would bring about a calm and peace to many of those in times of sorrow.
             Father of mercies and God of all consolation,
you peruse us with untiring love
and dispel the shadow of death
with the bright dawn of life. 
            Comfort your family in their loss and sorrow.
Be our refuge and our strength, O Lord,
and lift us from the depths of grief
into the peace and light of your presence. 
            Your son, our Lord Jesus Christ,
by dying has destroyed our death,
and by rising, restored our life.
Enable us therefore to press on toward him,
so that, after our earthly course is run,
he may reunite us with those we love,
when every tear will be wiped away. 
We ask this through Christ our Lord. Amen

Scripture is from the NABRE 
By David E.Gonzales

Monday, October 15, 2012

The Religious, Left? or HONESTLY! Part Two

To be honest with you I do not believe that there is a Religious left. Nor do I believe there is a Religious right. I believe that we are either following the edicts of the faith we align ourselves with, or we are not. I do believe that the further to the political left/progressive we live our lives, the increasingly secular we become.
Why do so many publicly disclaim a dogmatic aspect of their faith? And why then, do we still go to service on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday and participate fully? I wonder if attending service helps us to wash away the life we live during the week. Our faith is in direct response to how we believe that God, Spirit, or Higher Power has been revealed to us. And yet somehow we also believe that the way our organized religions’ express that faith is not in accordance to that same revelation. It has been said that our faith, or the faith, is not here for our convenience. I would say that this is quite true. It is, however, also true that we follow this faith, freely. There is no coercion from this God, spirituality, or Higher Power. There is no government forcing us to follow the edicts of any particular faith. I think that it is true that we, as “the flesh is weak”, (Matt, 26; 41b) have that weakness to follow our faith to its fullest convenience. And in the process we push our spiritual lives to the side.
It is also true that we as a people of God, have the natural instinct to question almost everything. But questioning is very different than living our lives in direct conflict to our faith. Questioning can bring us closer to our faith. It causes us to study, to dig deeper into how these edicts were developed. Expressing our thoughts in writing is an especially fine way to reach an increased understanding of our faith.
I think that peer pressure also plays a role in how we live our faith. I would suppose that many a young man and woman have had their lives ruined because of the pressure they were not able to withstand from their peers. And of course this holds true to adults as well. If the truth be told, the more we accept a secular stance in our lives the further we distance ourselves from our God, Spirit, or Higher Power. And the further we get from God, our spiritual center, the more influenced we can become by the secular movement.
            How many of us present ourselves in our place of worship in the same manner that we do in our place of business or recreation? I will use two examples to illustrate my point. I am not writing this in judgment, but only as a contemplative tool. 1) To the best of my knowledge none of the major faiths or religions, supports the action of abortion. Depending on the poll you choose, the vast percentage of Americans state that they identify with one of these major Religions, Faiths, or Spirituality’s, and yet about half of the population supports pro-choice. Why? These two realities most definitely seem to be opposed to one and another. And it most certainly divides a faith between those that live their faith as fully as possible and those that live their lives inconsistent with their faith.
            2) When you are home with family or alone, do you say your prayers of thanks and praise before your meals? I would think that great a majority of the populace does. Now, how do you compare that to giving thanks and praise when you are at a restaurant? I know that when I go out I see very few groups of friends and/or family taking the time to give thanks in their faith tradition. Why? Is it because many of us feel uncomfortable or embarrassed to make a sign of the cross or hold hands in public? For me, I find that a quick, quiet prayer before meals goes unnoticed by the vast majority. And I can attest that I have never had anyone make a terse comment about my public yet quiet outward display of faith. I also must admit that I feel good about presenting myself and my faith in this manner.
Ask yourself this; where are you in your spiritual life? Do you live full time in your faith; are you a part-timer? Or are you a full time secular? What is the extent of your faith? Is it the hour or two you spend at service, while the rest of the week is “what feels good”?  I don’t have the answer for anyone except me, and you have the answer for you.

Scripture is from the NABRE
By David E.Gonzales

Monday, October 8, 2012

Gods Gender?

           I was reading an article a while ago by a prominent Christian Bishop, and I came across his reference to God as (s)he. As I read through the article I realized that there was no particular reason to make such a reference about God, at least as God is understood in the Christian faith. After I finished and took some time to contemplate the structure of God as portrayed in this article, I felt a pulling of the Holy Sprit to express my feelings and understanding of God on this subject of gender.
Are we as a people of faith still wrapped up in the trivial discussion of God’s gender? Are we still so arrogant as to believe that God is male or female, and therefore one of us is better, holier or more preferred by God? To say that God is male or female is to put a limit on God. We believe that God is limitless, thus making that statement false. It would also be incorrect to state that God is genderless. We are created by God both male and female. This is, in part, how God know us and love us and we know and love God. It would be increasingly correct to state that God is gender in its totality. I do not use a word of stated fact here simply because God is indeed a mystery. A mystery is that which the human mind cannot fully comprehend. And as a mystery, we can only apply what God has revealed to us through Sacred Scripture and Tradition.
            As we continue to strive in political correctness, some have so exaggerated this issue that we miss the point: that this adds up to but a speck in the question, what is God. Gods very being is Truth and Love. (1CCC-231). God’s love is a love that gives life. A love that allows that life to make its own decisions, good, bad, right, wrong, creative, destructive. A love that gives us the freedom to choose our own path, even a path that does not include this same God.
The directive of how to live our lives is clear and simple. That is to love, love in charity, love one another as God has loved us. Let us live in the simplicity that is the commandment of love. (2Jn. 13:34) Let us live our lives in the love of God that was given to us through our Christ.
            I understand the need of some to create controversy by using gender as a tool. In this I mean, the need for some to use this tool as a means to demonstrate their position, their personal quest. But doesn’t that make us look trivial?  We, as a people, have a need to elevate ourselves, or our ideals, in doing so we inadvertently bring down that which is God. Would it not be better to live our lives in the love of God in order to bring about the same conditions of conscience? I offer a personal challenge, to see how long you can go without referring to God as either a “he” or a “she”. This will require a deliberate effort to reconstruct your thoughts without the use of gender. Have a little fun with this, after all God does have a sense of humor.
            Yes, Jesus said to call God our Father, but not in the sense of Gods gender. This is the God our Father as creator, teacher, guide, etc, and one who loves us as his children. But God is not male; God is not female, in and of itself. For we know that God is so very much more! Let us keep God in proper perspective, “…the one who is and who was and who is to come…” (2Rev. 1:8) that which is truth and love in totality. May Gods love be with you, male and female, always.

1.      CCC = Catechism of the Catholic Church
2.      Scripture is from the NABRE
By David E.Gonzales

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Honestly! - Part One

 *Honest = honorable in principles, intentions, and actions, upright and fair
Spirituality = how you live your life in relationship to, how you understand your higher power

            So, just how honest are you? No, not with all those other people, just how honest are you with you? Just how well do you live a life that is in line with your spiritual beliefs? How consistent are you in practice? Are you comfortable in your own skin? If you didn’t respond with a resounding “VERY WELL” then please read on.

Many people have difficulties, or challenges that stem from their spirituality, or their lack of a practiced spirituality. Unfortunately, most people don’t even realize that the feeling they have of imbalance in life is very much in tune to the way they live their lives. One example may be; a man and woman are living together outside of marriage, one or the other or even both may have a conflict within themselves that causes conflict in the relationship. I use this example only due to its commonality. Their personal ethical, moral, or religious ideals do not reflect the life that they desire or believe they should be living. The solution then is to resolve the conflict between how they are living their lives and how they perceive their lives should be lived. They will have to make a physical, emotional and spiritual decision as to how they will bring their current situation into balance. These are hard decisions to make; but before they can make a confident decision that will affect not only their life but the lives of their family and friends, they need to fully understand themselves and their God.  Bringing your spiritual life in concert with your physical life can help with these decisions and bring tremendous peace into your existence.
The first key, as simple as it sounds, is to understand your God or, if you desire, your higher power. A person may believe that their God is a good and kind God, but then they ask God “why have you given me this pain to deal with”. They may not even realize that this is a conflict within their own understanding of God and it is causing them the emotional imbalance that they are currently experiencing. It is not God that is causing their pain, but conceivably it is simply the environment that they live in. How well do you take care of yourself? What kind of people do you associate with? What is the environment in your neighborhood, or your employ? Or it could be because of the decisions they have made in the past. You can’t change the past, but you can certainly shape the future.
            The next key is to understand you, and this is probably the most difficult. Can you honestly answer this; what kind of person am I? Now, can you answer this question in detail? For instance; when you are in traffic do you act as politely to the person that cut you off as you do when you’re with family? Are you as kind at home as you are when dealing with business partners or old friends? Is your God with you at all times, or just when it’s convenient? These could be the personal questions that you need to come to a conclusive understanding of. But indeed, you need to come to a conclusive understanding of yourself. The better you understand yourself and your tendencies the better you can react to all the different challenges that life will bring about. The better prepared you will be to not make the same mistakes again and again.
Remember God does not cause us pain. Sin, pain and death came into this world through the sin of Adam. These anxieties or pains can be caused by ourselves or at least by our environment, our entire environment, where we live, the people we associate ourselves with etc. And of course sometimes events just happen; unfortunate circumstances in many cases simply cannot be avoided. How we react depends in part to how we live and comprehend our existence in our relationship with our God. This requires an internal evaluation of who we are, who we really are. Not the ideal we wish for, but the true person that engages others in our everyday lives. This also requires the study of what each individual calls God. In order to live a life that is spirituality honest, you must first understand your God.
This is a brief illustration of being honest with ourselves in our Spirituality. By understanding who you are as a person and what you believe in, you can live a more peaceful and a exceedingly balanced life. Understanding yourself, your beliefs and how they work together is the key to finding a consistently happy life. You are an evolving being, as a lump of clay can be shaped into a fine vase; you too can shape your lived life and your spiritual life to be one in the same.  This is approximately one page of text that will inevitably lead to a lifetime of soul searching. Take your time; be honest with yourself and with others. Oh, and remember to smile as often as possible.
           
*Dictionary.com
By David E.Gonzales

Friday, September 28, 2012

To profane or… (non-religious)

           I have decided to dedicate myself to creating environmentally safe eye and ear zones. Yes, that means actually taking the time to properly articulate an idea or emotion instead of resorting to the use of “shock” terminology. Mind you I have no intention of trying to change the world into following me on my path to spiritual constancy. Only that I am on a personal mission to be a better me. I realize that it is simply easier to use profanity to express oneself than to stop and think through an idea or emotion. For me, this will include not using punctuation in place of foul language or a combination of letters and punctuation to press forward the idea of words that are less than socially proper.

I don’t believe this will be that difficult to accomplish since my propensity to use this type of language is minimal. However, I have been known to allow an occasional word of this nature to land on the ears of an un-expecting soul. It is this that I wish to eliminate from my personal inconsistencies. I do expect that the elimination of soft profanity will be a slightly more difficult to achieve. While some words are not necessarily considered profane, they do lead one to consider them in terms that are coarser than the word itself denotes. Of course this would depend on the context that the word is used.

So while I ask that others respect my desire to keep clear my eyes and ears of less than well articulated speech, I will continue to respect your freedom of speech as long as it is not a deliberate attempt to offend me. Of course, you are welcome to join me in my quest for spiritual constancy.

May peace be with you, along with your ears and eyes.

by David E.Gonzales

Caritas through Church

          Caritas* through Church this is how we, Christians, live our faith; it is our expressed relationship with God. We have been commanded by God, through Christ, to take care of one another without judgment or for reciprocation. God is love, therefore, acts of love are the purest way for us to relate to God and the purest acts of love are acts of charity. Love is not just some heartfelt utterance but is instead a word of action.

In the early days of Judaism, the people were set upon to take care of their own people. All others were to be, at the very least, avoided. Even if a gentile should convert to the Jewish faith they were still considered as second class within the community. Jesus brought a sense of charity to a new level of consciousness. He insisted that the Jewish people, and in fact all people, should treat each other with this sense of caritas. That all peoples are the people of the one true God and are included in God’s plan for us, his people. Christ made this call to charity, personal. In fact, at no place in The Bible is there a call for centralized charity. In this I mean there is no call to government** implemented charity, no call for a forced financial equalization of all people to end poverty. The Church as an organized group for the purpose of charitable works is a truly expressed relational connection with our God through Jesus Christ and with the Holy Spirit. The call of our Christ is a personal call for humanity to enact caritas. For example in Matthew it is written, “Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me”. (Matt. 25; 40) Even more revealing is how Jesus reiterates this teaching a mere five verses later, “Amen I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me”. (Matt. 25; 45) I believe is done so that we, his people, do not evade responsibility by turning charity into a bureaucracy. Matthew 25; 31-46 is for me one of the most telling teachings of our Christ. In this teaching our Christ spells out that we have a duty to maintain our salvation through caritas. Not only is there a benefit to this action but a detriment if we don’t. Evil does not take prisoners, but instead takes volunteers. Evil has no problem with a good intention today for the price of soul tomorrow. Imagine the world as a whole that hands over its gift of salvation. As the public perception of a giving government continues to grow, the growth of atheism also continues. The Church is being progressively seen as an obstacle within the daily lives of her members. After all, what do you need the Church for if the government is supplying you with supplements to your life? The Church then becomes but “a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal”. (1 Cor 13; 1b) Another way to express is to say- “Children, let us love not in word or speech but in deed and truth”. (1 John 3:18,)

The teaching of social justice including the government in the definition of “institutions” is extended beyond its creative intent. There is a need to separate “social justice” from “charity” the line between them should not be blurred. If separated, social justice would then be leaning strongly to the “laws” of society, while charity would lean just as strongly toward the works of caritas. I understand that there will always be some overlap in the application of these two teachings, but the overlap needs to be contained. “It grows increasingly true that the obligations of justice and love are fulfilled only if each person, contributing to the common good, according to his own abilities and the needs of others, also promotes and assists the public and private institutions dedicated to bettering the conditions of human life”.3  In this quote from Gaudiem et Spes justice and love are listed as two separate entities. While they work together in union for the greater good of mankind, they remain unique in their actions and purpose.  The words “also promotes” indicates that personal involvement in caritas is our first, and therefore, our most essential action in our commandment to serve. While this most certainly does not eliminate public institutions from charity, it does put it forward as a second alternative to the works of the Church. “Citizens, for their part, either individually or collectively, must be careful not to attribute excessive power to public authority, not to make exaggerated and untimely demands upon it in their own interests, lessening in this way the responsible role of persons, families and social groups”.4

The Eucharist is the” source and summit” (CCC-1324) and the “sum and summary” (CCC-1327) of our faith, and will always be so. However, “above all, charity ‘binds everything together in perfect harmony’”. (CCC-815) Christ gave his life for us; caritas is how we give life to his sacrifice. It is how we return his love for us. The call of Christ to love God with all our hearts is the call to caritas. This brings our faith into the perspective that is our life. Caritas is how we are to live our faith, it is how we are to love God, and it is how we are to follow the commandments of our Christ. “The first is this: Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is Lord alone! You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength. The second is this: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.” (MK 12:29-31) Loving our neighbor as ourselves is loving our God! Here the words love and caritas can be looked upon as one and the same. How we treat each other in our daily lives define us as Christians that actively live the Gospels, or instead, as a group of Sunday Christians acting in love for the benefit of ourselves. “Jesus is the model for the Beatitudes and the norm of the new law: ‘Love one another as I have loved you.’ This love implies an effective offering of oneself, after his example.” [CCC 459] This is the way we love God: through the treatment of all Gods’ children. Brother, sister, friend and foe, we can make no exception to whom we serve. We must offer ourselves for the benefit of others as Jesus our Christ offered himself for us. We do these works and we pray for the veil of ignorance to be lifted from the eyes of those who have yet to see. We pray that all may hear, see, and feel the true love of our Father. We pray that all will come to him with the guidance of the Holy Spirit and the strength to follow in his sons’ example.

 “Our’ bread is the ‘one’ loaf for the ‘many.’ In the Beatitudes ‘poverty’ is the virtue of sharing: it calls us to communicate and share both material and spiritual goods, not by coercion but out of love, so that the abundance of some may remedy the needs of others”.  [CCC-2833] the phrase “not by coercion but out of love” Is stated here for guidance and clarity, to keep us on the right path of caritas through the Church and to not allow us to get lazy in our efforts to follow the law of love. This furthers the idea of Christ’s teaching that caritas is not something that can be forced upon anyone, it must be a personal choice to give and not a governmental idea of social justice that implements a Robin Hood style of financial equality. Should the Church be calling out to the government to budget charity? Many say yes to this, claiming that is the only humanitarian thing to do. But is it really?  To use government to consolidate resources is to pass the buck of responsibly for us to care for each other. If you level the playing field to all the populace then you will more than likely have a world equal in poverty. I believe this would only create great competition for the limited recourses available.

Yes, government has a role in providing for those in need, it is not, however, the answer to the problem of the poor. I would indicate that the poor is not a problem, but instead a mission. Indeed the mission of humanity.

The government’s focus in charity should be primarily;
1) To not establish hurdles that hinder charity, either financially or physically.
2) To make clear the path for charitable institutions especially in the international community.
3) To make available it’s extraordinary recourses in the event of a natural disaster.   
The Church should have her plan in the instance of natural disaster, to be ready to assist with
International aid, in conjunction with the government, in an as organized a manner as possible.

                     “Love - Caritas will always prove necessary, even in the most just society. There is no ordering of the State so just that it can eliminate the need for a service of love. Whoever wants to eliminate love is preparing to eliminate man as such. There will always be suffering which cries out for consolation and help. There will always be loneliness. There will always be situations of material need where help in the form of concrete love of neighbor is indispensable. The State which would provide everything, absorbing everything into itself, would ultimately become a mere bureaucracy incapable of guaranteeing the very thing which the suffering person - every person - needs: namely, loving personal concern. We do not need a State which regulates and controls everything, but a State which, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, generously acknowledges and supports initiatives arising from the different social forces and combines spontaneity with closeness to those in need. The Church is one of those living forces: she is alive with the love enkindled by the Spirit of Christ. This love does not simply offer people material help, but refreshment and care for their soul, something which often is even more necessary than material support. In the end, the claim that just social structures would make works of charity superfluous masks a materialist conception of man: the mistaken notion that man can live ‘by bread alone’ – a conviction that demeans man and ultimately disregards all that is specifically human”.2

The first two sentences in this excerpt from the Holy Father say much of our need to be active in charity through the Church. Government institutions simply cannot supply through hand outs the needs of the poor. It is a task that cannot be accomplished without the guidance and power of the Holy Spirit. To attempt to tackle the task of caring for the needy is too daunting a task to attempt simply as human beings. Our Christ stated that, “the poor you will always have with you;” (Matt 26; 11a), it is necessary for the Church to always be strongly active in caritas. It is essential for the survival of the Church to not let the governments of the world be allowed to replace the Church as the first in caritas. Part two of Deus Caritas Est is filled with the call for the church, her people at all levels of order, to be pursuant with the teachings of our Christ in this most important commandment.: to love one another. The state would absorb everything including the freedoms that we have come enjoy, and perhaps, now take for granted. The state would become out of necessity, increasingly dictating, in order to maintain order and conserve resources.

The single biggest divide in the Church today is whether or not, or perhaps how much, the government should be engaged in charity. Those who see themselves as progressives seem to think that the governments can, with the stroke of a pen, eliminate poverty. I strongly disagree. The government has no source of income other than that of taxes, the forced taking of income from any or all, to redistribute to those that they deem qualified. This is done without taking into consideration the probity of the action, instead considering only the legal necessity, guidelines and/or the political advantage. To propose that government can eliminate poverty in this manner, I believe is a fallacy and should be refuted.


There have been many writings on the correlation between happiness and works of charity; I am not going to explore the physiological angles within this opinion.

I have written these words as I sense have been guided by the Holy Spirit. I do believe that this has been written in truth and are words that the Spirit wishes to have spoken. I hope and pray that this paper will bring about discussion within and throughout the Church as a whole, and in doing so will bring about at least some unification in the division that exists in the Church today.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Encyclopedia Britannica (on-line edition)
Encyclopedia

Charity

in Christian thought, the highest form of love, signifying the reciprocal love between God and man that is made manifest in unselfish love of one's fellow men. St. Paul's classical description of charity is found in the New Testament(I Cor. 13). In Christian theology and ethics, charity (a translation of the Greek word agape, also meaning "love") is most eloquently shown in the life, teachings, and death of Jesus Christ. St. Augustine summarized much of Christian thought about charity when he wrote: "Charity is a virtue which, when our affections are perfectly ordered, unites us to God, for by it we love him." Using this definition and others from the Christian tradition, the medieval theologians, especially St. Thomas Aquinas, placed charity in the context of the other Christian virtues and specified its role as "the foundation or root" of them all

** meaning all levels of government.

references:
1 = All references to biblical scripture by this author is from the NABRE
2 = Deus Caritas Est, Benedict XVI
3 = Gaudiem et Spes, #30
4 = Gaudiem et Spes, #75
CCC = Catechism of the Catholic Church

by David E.Gonzales
All rights reserved